Coherent state
From Academic Kids

In quantum mechanics a coherent state is a specific kind of quantum state of the quantum harmonic oscillator whose dynamics most closely resemble the oscillating behaviour of a classical harmonic oscillator system. It was the first example of quantum dynamics when Erwin Schrödinger derived it in 1926 while searching for solutions of the Schrödinger equation that satisfy the correspondence principle. The quantum harmonic oscillator and hence, the coherent state, arise in the quantum theory of a wide range of physical systems. For instance, a coherent state describes the oscillating motion of the particle in a quadratic potential well. Or in the quantum theory of light (quantum electrodynamics) and other bosonic quantum field theories the coherent state of a field describes an oscillating field, the closest quantum state to a classical sinusoidal wave.
Coherent_noise_compare3.jpg
Coherent_state_wavepacket.jpg
Wigner_function_coherent_state.jpg
Photon_numbers_coherent_state.jpg
Contents 
Coherent states in quantum optics
In classical optics light is thought of as electromagnetic waves radiating from a source. Specifically coherent light is thought of as light that is emitted by many such sources that are in phase. For instance a light bulb radiates light that is the result of waves being emitted at all the points along the filament. Such light is incoherent because the process is highly random in space and time (see chaotic light or thermal light). In a laser however light is emitted by a carefully controlled system in processes that are not random but interconnected by stimulation and the resulting light is highly ordered, or coherent. Therefore a coherent state corresponds closely to the quantum state of light emitted by an ideal laser. Semiclassically we describe such a state by an electric field oscillating as a stable wave.
Contrary to the coherent state which is the most wavelike quantum state, the Fock state (e.g. a single photon) is the most particlelike state. It is indivisible and contains only one quanta of energy. These two states are examples of the opposite extremes in the concept of waveparticle duality. A coherent state equally distributes its quantum mechanical uncertainty which means that the phase and amplitude uncertainty are approximately equal. Conversely, in a singleparticle state the phase is completely uncertain.
Quantum mechanical definition
Coherent_state2.png
Mathematically, the coherent state <math> \alpha\rangle<math> is defined to be the eigenstate of the annihilation operator <math> a <math>. Formally, this reads:
 <math>a\alpha\rangle=\alpha\alpha\rangle<math>
Note that since <math>a<math> is not hermitian, <math>\alpha = \alphae^{i\theta}<math> is complex. <math>\alpha<math> and <math>\theta<math> are called the amplitude and phase of the state.
Physically, this formula means that a coherent state is left unchanged by the detection (or annihilation) of a particle. Consequently, in a coherent state, one has exactly the same probability to detect a second particle. Note, this condition is necessary for the coherent state's Poissonian detection statistics, as discussed below. Compare this to a singleparticle state (Fock state): Once one particle is detected, we have zero probability of detecting another.
For the following discussion we need to define the dimensionless X and P quadratures. For a harmonic oscillator, x = (mωπ/h)^{1/2}X is the oscillating particle's position and p = (mωh/π)^{1/2}P is its momentum. For an optical field, E_{R} = (hω/πε_{0}V)^{1/2}cosθX; and E_{I} = (hω/πε_{0}V)^{1/2}sinθP; are the real and imaginary components of the electric field.
Erwin Schrödinger was searching for the most classicallike states when he first introduced coherent states. He described them as the quantum state of the harmonic oscillator which minimizes the uncertainty relation with uncertainty equally distributed in both X and P quadratures (ie. ΔX = ΔY = 1/2). From the generalized uncertainty relation, it is shown that such a state α> must obey the equation
 <math>(P\langle P\rangle)\alpha\rangle=i(X\langle X\rangle)\alpha\rangle<math>
In the general case, if the uncertainty is not equally distributed in the X and P component, the state is called a squeezed coherent state.
If this formula is written back in terms of a and a^{†}, it becomes:
 <math> a{\alpha}\rangle=(\langle X\rangle+i\langle P\rangle){\alpha}\rangle<math>
The coherent state's location in the complex plane (phase space) is centered at the position and momentum of a classical oscillator of the same phase θ and amplitude (or the same complex electric field value for a electromagnetic wave). As shown in Figure 2, the uncertainty, equally spread in all directions, is represented by a disk with diameter 1/2. As the phase increases the coherent state circles the origin and the disk neither distorts nor spreads. This the most similar a quantum state can be to a single point in phase space.
Since the uncertainty (and hence measurement noise) stays constant at 1/2 as the amplitude of the oscillation increases, the state behaves more and more like a sinusoidal wave, as shown in Figure 1. Conversely, since the vaccuum state 0> is just the coherent state with α=0, all coherent states have the same uncertainty as the vacuum. Therefore one can interpret the quantum noise of a coherent state as being due to the vacuum fluctuations.
Furthermore, it is sometimes useful to define a coherent state simply as the vacuum state displaced to a location α in phase space. Mathematically this is done by the action of the displacement operator D(α):
 <math>\alpha\rangle=e^{\alpha a^\dagger  \alpha^*a}0\rangle = D(\alpha)0\rangle<math>
This can be easily obtained, as can virtually all results involving coherent states, using the representation of the coherent state in the basis of Fock states:
 <math>\alpha\rangle=e^{{\alpha^2\over2}}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{\alpha^n\over\sqrt{n!}}n\rangle<math>.
A stable classical wave has a constant intensity. Consequently, the probability of detecting n photons in a given amount of time is constant with time. This condition ensures there will be shot noise in our detection. Specificially, the probability of detecting n photons is Poissonian:
 <math>P(n)=e^{
}\frac{ ^n}{n!}<math>
Similarly, the average photon number in coherent state <n>=<a^{†}a>=α^{2} and the variance (Δn)^{2}= Var(a^{†}a)=α^{2}, identical to the variance of the Poissonian distribution. Not only does a coherent state go to a classical sinusoidal wave in the limit of large α but the detection statistics of it are equal to that of a classical stable wave for all values of α.
This also follows from the fact that for the prediction of the detection results at a single detector (and time) any state of light can always be modelled as a collection of classical waves (see degree of coherence). However, for the prediction of higherorder measurement like intensity correlations (which measure the degree of nthorder coherence) this is not true. The coherent state is unique in the fact that all norders of coherence are equal to 1. It is perfectly coherent to all orders.
There are other reasons why a coherent state can be considered the most classical state. Glauber coined the term "coherent state" and proved they are produced when a classical electrical current interacts with the electromagnetic field. In the process he introduced the coherent state to quantum optics. In general when a quantum state of light is split at a beamsplitter, the two output modes are entangled. Aharonov proved that coherent states are the only pure states of light that remain unentangled (and thus classical) when split into two states.
From Figure 5, simple geometry gives Δθ=1/2α. From this we can see that there is a tradeoff between number uncertainty and phase uncertainty ΔθΔn = 1/2, the numberphase uncertainty relation. Note that this is not a formal uncertainty relation as there is no uniquely defined phase operator in quantum mechanics.
Mathematical characteristics
The coherent state does not display all the nice mathematical features of a Fock state, for instance two different coherent states are not orthogonal:
 <math>\langle\beta\alpha\rangle=e^{{1\over2}(\beta^2+\alpha^22\beta^*\alpha)}\neq\delta(\alpha\beta)<math>
so that if the oscillator is in the quantum state α> it is also with nonzero probability in the other quantum state β> (but this is the more improbable the farther apart the states are situated in phase space). However, since they obey a closure relation, any state can be decomposed on the set of coherent states. They hence form an overcomplete basis in which one can diagonally decompose any state. This is the premise for the Glauber P representation.
Another difficulty is that a^{†} has no eigenket (and a has no eigenbra). The formal following equality is the closest substitute and turns out to be very useful for technical computations:
 <math>a^{\dagger}\alpha\rangle=\left({\partial\over\partial\alpha}+{\alpha^*\over 2}\right)\alpha\rangle<math>
Coherent states of BoseEinstein condensates
 A BoseEinstein condensate (BEC) is a collection of boson atoms that are all in the same quantum state. An approximate theoretical description of its properties can be derived by assuming the BEC is in a coherent state. However, unlike photons atoms interact with each other so it now appears that it more likely to be one of the squeezed coherent states mentioned above.
Generalizations
 In quantum field theory and string theory, a generalization of coherent states to the case of infinitely many degrees of freedom is used to define a vacuum state with a different vacuum expectation value from the original vacuum.
References
 E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 14 (1926) 664.
 R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131 (1963) 2766.
See also
External links
 Quantum states of the light field (http://gerdbreitenbach.de/gallery)
references
 Loudon, Rodney, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University Press, 2000), [ISBN 0198501773]
 G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, "Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light", Nature, 387, 471 (1997) (http://www.exphy.uniduesseldorf.de/Publikationen/1997/N387/471z.htm)de:Kohärente Strahlung